Froman v. Lefkowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Froman v. Lefkowitz

50 A.D.2d 604, 375 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12390

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 24, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 50 A.D.2d 604 (Froman v. Lefkowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Froman v. Lefkowitz, 50 A.D.2d 604, 375 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12390 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding to quash a subpoena, petitioner appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated July 2, 1975, as, after granting his motion to vacate a previous order of the same court, directed him to appear and testify before respondent or one of his deputies and to produce books, etc. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. Appellant shall attend and testify, and produce the books, etc., upon such date as shall be fixed by the Attorney-General upon not less than 10 days’ written notice. There is no merit to appellant’s contention that a cross motion is required before the court can direct attendance pursuant to a subpoena stayed by prior court order. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Brennan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding to quash a subpoena, petitioner appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated July 2, 1975, as, after granting his motion to vacate a previous order of the same court, directed him to appear and testify before respondent or one of his deputies and to produce books, etc. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. Appellant shall attend and testify, and produce the books, etc., upon such date as shall be fixed by the Attorney-General upon not less than 10 days’ written notice. There is no merit to appellant’s contention that a cross motion is required before the court can direct attendance pursuant to a subpoena stayed by prior court order. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Brennan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 604, 375 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/froman-v-lefkowitz-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack