Frohock v. . Edwards

Superior Court of North Carolina

Frohock v. . Edwards

3 N.C. 361

DecidedJuly 5, 1805

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.C. 361 (Frohock v. . Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frohock v. . Edwards, 3 N.C. 361 (N.C. Ct. App. 1805).

Pincite

Opinion

took time to consider; and after two or three days directed the costs to be paid by the complainant. He said there had been a careless delay on the part of the complainant; and the defendant had a right to ascertain, by putting the complainant to prove, whether there had been such a contract, and whether it had been executed on (362) the side of complainant. He had therefore done nothing amiss, and should not be compelled to pay the costs.

NOTE — See White v. Thompson, 21 N.C. 493; see, also, Tindall v.Mounger, 5 N.C. 290. *Page 319

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

took time to consider; and after two or three days directed the costs to be paid by the complainant. He said there had been a careless delay on the part of the complainant; and the defendant had a right to ascertain, by putting the complainant to prove, whether there had been such a contract, and whether it had been executed on (362) the side of complainant. He had therefore done nothing amiss, and should not be compelled to pay the costs.

NOTE — See White v. Thompson, 21 N.C. 493; see, also, Tindall v.Mounger, 5 N.C. 290. *Page 319

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.C. 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frohock-v-edwards-ncsuperct-1805.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack