Frohman Holland v. Hogan, District Attorney

392 U.S. 654, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1342, 88 S. Ct. 2271, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1164
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 17, 1968·No. 653·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for further consideration in light of Gardner v. Broderick, ante, p. 273, and George Campbell Painting Corp. v. Reid, ante, p. 286.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frohman Holland v. Hogan, District Attorney, 392 U.S. 654, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1342, 88 S. Ct. 2271, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1164 (1968).

392 U.S. 654 (Frohman Holland v. Hogan, District Attorney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gardner v. Broderick
392 U.S. 273 (Supreme Court, 1968)
George Campbell Painting Corp. v. Reid
392 U.S. 286 (Supreme Court, 1968)