Frohm v. State

269 N.E.2d 409, 28 N.Y.2d 703
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 3, 1971
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 269 N.E.2d 409 (Frohm v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frohm v. State, 269 N.E.2d 409, 28 N.Y.2d 703 (N.Y. 1971).

Opinion

28 N.Y.2d 703 (1971)

Jacquelyn F. Frohm, as Administratrix of The Estate of Robert E. Freida, Deceased, Appellant,
v.
State of New York, Respondent. (Claim No. 46893.)

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued February 16, 1971.
Decided March 3, 1971.

John Van Voorhis and Samuel C. Pilato for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Jeremiah Jochnowitz and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Skiff v. State
125 Misc. 2d 791 (New York State Court of Claims, 1984)
Wingerter v. State
79 A.D.2d 817 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 N.E.2d 409, 28 N.Y.2d 703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frohm-v-state-ny-1971.