Frohm v. State

269 N.E.2d 409, 28 N.Y.2d 703

New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 3, 1971·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

28 N.Y.2d 703 (1971)

Jacquelyn F. Frohm, as Administratrix of The Estate of Robert E. Freida, Deceased, Appellant,
v.
State of New York, Respondent. (Claim No. 46893.)

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued February 16, 1971. Decided March 3, 1971.

John Van Voorhis and Samuel C. Pilato for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Jeremiah Jochnowitz and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

28 N.Y.2d 703 (1971)

Jacquelyn F. Frohm, as Administratrix of The Estate of Robert E. Freida, Deceased, Appellant,
v.
State of New York, Respondent. (Claim No. 46893.)

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued February 16, 1971. Decided March 3, 1971.

John Van Voorhis and Samuel C. Pilato for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Jeremiah Jochnowitz and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Frohm v. State, 269 N.E.2d 409, 28 N.Y.2d 703 (N.Y. 1971).

Pincite

269 N.E.2d 409 (Frohm v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

125 Misc. 2d 791 (New York State Court of Claims, 1984)

Wingerter v. State

79 A.D.2d 817 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)