Frohm v. Metzger

138 So. 2d 330
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 21, 1962
DocketNo. 31317
StatusPublished

This text of 138 So. 2d 330 (Frohm v. Metzger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frohm v. Metzger, 138 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Court has determined to grant cer-tiorari in this case and hear argument on both the question of jurisdiction and the merits.

[331]*331The request of counsel for respondents to order the transmittal of the entire record of testimony for our consideration is denied but with leave to respondents to file in this Court and serve on opposing counsel prior to the date set for oral argument a certified copy of such portions of the record in the district court as they deem essential to the disposition of this cause on the merits, in the event the Court should find it has jurisdiction of the cause.

ROBERTS, C. J., and DREW, THOR-NAL and O’CONNELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 So. 2d 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frohm-v-metzger-fla-1962.