Frohberg v. Frohberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Frohberg v. Frohberg

141 A.D.2d 606, 529 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6640

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 13, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 141 A.D.2d 606 (Frohberg v. Frohberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frohberg v. Frohberg, 141 A.D.2d 606, 529 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6640 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the nonparty Devitt and Spellman appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Molloy, J.), entered August 19, 1987, which directed it to pay Benisatto and Ra 18% of a $250,000 legal fee, and the non-party Benisatto and Ra cross-appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of the same order as failed to provide for interest on that award.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the Supreme Court’s determination that the outgoing law firm of Benisatto and Ra is entitled to quantum meruit compensation in the amount of 18% of the $250,000 legal fee collected by Devitt and Spellman (see, Chugerman v Wagner, 42 AD2d 772, 773).

We find no merit to the contentions raised on the cross appeal. Lawrence, J. P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the nonparty Devitt and Spellman appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Molloy, J.), entered August 19, 1987, which directed it to pay Benisatto and Ra 18% of a $250,000 legal fee, and the non-party Benisatto and Ra cross-appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of the same order as failed to provide for interest on that award.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the Supreme Court’s determination that the outgoing law firm of Benisatto and Ra is entitled to quantum meruit compensation in the amount of 18% of the $250,000 legal fee collected by Devitt and Spellman (see, Chugerman v Wagner, 42 AD2d 772, 773).

We find no merit to the contentions raised on the cross appeal. Lawrence, J. P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 A.D.2d 606, 529 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frohberg-v-frohberg-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack