Frogge v. Belford

Supreme Court of Kansas

Frogge v. Belford

215 P.2d 200, 168 Kan. 582, 1950 Kan. LEXIS 443

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedFebruary 28, 1950

DocketNo. 37,610

StatusPublished

This text of 215 P.2d 200 (Frogge v. Belford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frogge v. Belford, 215 P.2d 200, 168 Kan. 582, 1950 Kan. LEXIS 443 (kan 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

For reasons deemed to be sufficient a rehearing was granted in this case. The pertinent facts and issues involved are set forth at length in our original opinion (168 Kan. 74, 211 P. 2d 49) and need not be restated.

The case was not rebriefed but it was reargued by counsel for the respective parties whose oral presentation of the cause was confined to matters discussed in the briefs and failed to raise any questions of law not already given consideration in the original opinion.

After having examined the briefs and carefully considered all questions argued on the rehearing the court fails to find anything warranting a change in the former opinion. Therefore it adheres to. its original decision affirming the judgment of the district court of Sedgwick county in sustaining a demurrer to the appellants’ evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI