Froemling v. Boxer Property Management
223 F. App'x 422
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 27, 2007·No. No. 06-20760·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Alexis Froemling appeals the district court’s summary judgment that she take nothing in her lawsuit brought under Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Having reviewed the record de novo, we affirm for the reasons given in the district court’s thorough memorandum and order.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Froemling v. Boxer Property Management, 223 F. App'x 422 (5th Cir. 2007).
223 F. App'x 422 (Froemling v. Boxer Property Management) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Hernandez-Galvan
632 F.3d 192 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Shameke Walker
Second Circuit, 2010
United States v. Walker
595 F.3d 441 (Second Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Ellis
564 F.3d 370 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)