Froehle v. Hobart Corp.

270 A.D.2d 305, 704 N.Y.S.2d 610, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2704

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants third-party plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D’Emilio, J.), entered April 29, 1999, which granted the motion of the third-party defendant for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the contention of the defendants third-party plaintiffs, Workers’ Compensation Law § 11, as amended (L 1996, ch 635, § 2), is applicable here, since the action was com[306]*306menced after the effective date of the amendment (see, Majewski v Broadalbin-Perth Cent. School Dist., 91 NY2d 577, 590; Browning v County Fence Co., 259 AD2d 578). Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, S. Miller, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Froehle v. Hobart Corp., 270 A.D.2d 305, 704 N.Y.S.2d 610, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2704 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

270 A.D.2d 305 (Froehle v. Hobart Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School District
696 N.E.2d 978 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
Browning v. County Fence Co.
259 A.D.2d 578 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)