Frizzy Hairstylists, Inc. v. Eagle Star Insurance
This text of 93 Misc. 2d 59 (Frizzy Hairstylists, Inc. v. Eagle Star Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Judgment unanimously modified by deleting therefrom the [60]*60award for punitive damages; and, as so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs.
The complaint herein merely alleges that defendant refused to pay under the terms of a policy issued to the plaintiff after due demand therefor was made. It is the opinion of this court that there can be no recovery for punitive damages herein (M. S. R. Assoc. v Consolidated Mut. Ins. Co., 58 AD2d 858; see, also, Garrity v Lyle Stuart, Inc., 40 NY2d 354, 358; Dembar v Reynolds & Co., 40 Misc 2d 84). While the conduct of the carrier herein is not to be condoned, its punishment is more properly within the province and jurisdiction of the State Superintendent of Insurance (see Insurance Law, §§ 5, 40-d, 274).
Concur: Pino, P. J., Rinaldi and Buschmann, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 Misc. 2d 59, 403 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1977 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frizzy-hairstylists-inc-v-eagle-star-insurance-nyappterm-1977.