Fritz v. Wright

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Fritz v. Wright

884 A.2d 250

DecidedOctober 4, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 884 A.2d 250 (Fritz v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fritz v. Wright, 884 A.2d 250 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 4th day of October 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal in the above captioned matter is GRANTED, limited to the following issue:

Whether 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5104(b) and Article I, Section 6 of the Pennsylvania Constitution require that the same ten jurors must vote the same on each question listed on a special interrogatory verdict sheet for there to be a “verdict”?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 4th day of October 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal in the above captioned matter is GRANTED, limited to the following issue:

Whether 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5104(b) and Article I, Section 6 of the Pennsylvania Constitution require that the same ten jurors must vote the same on each question listed on a special interrogatory verdict sheet for there to be a “verdict”?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

884 A.2d 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fritz-v-wright-pa-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack