Fritz v. West

Veterans Claims

Fritz v. West

13 Vet. App. 294, 2000 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 50, 2000 WL 86838

CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

DecidedJanuary 18, 2000

Docket97-2323

StatusPublished

This text of 13 Vet. App. 294 (Fritz v. West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fritz v. West, 13 Vet. App. 294, 2000 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 50, 2000 WL 86838 (Cal. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

This matter is before the Court as to the appellant’s application for attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (EAJA). In a November 23, 1999, opinion, the Court held in abeyance further proceedings on the EAJA application and directed the appellant to “file a verification as to whether or not he approves of the submission of the instant EAJA application.” Fritz v. West, 13 Vet.App. 190, 196 (1999). On December 21, 1999, the appellant filed a document entitled: “Submission undeR Protest of VERIFICATION OF APPELLANT OF HlS CONSENT to Counsel’s Submission of an EAJA Application to this Court” and a supplemental EAJA application.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, not later than 30 days after the date of this order, the Secretary *295 file a response to the appellant’s supplemental EAJA application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

This matter is before the Court as to the appellant’s application for attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (EAJA). In a November 23, 1999, opinion, the Court held in abeyance further proceedings on the EAJA application and directed the appellant to “file a verification as to whether or not he approves of the submission of the instant EAJA application.” Fritz v. West, 13 Vet.App. 190, 196 (1999). On December 21, 1999, the appellant filed a document entitled: “Submission undeR Protest of VERIFICATION OF APPELLANT OF HlS CONSENT to Counsel’s Submission of an EAJA Application to this Court” and a supplemental EAJA application.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, not later than 30 days after the date of this order, the Secretary *295 file a response to the appellant’s supplemental EAJA application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Vet. App. 294, 2000 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 50, 2000 WL 86838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fritz-v-west-cavc-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack