Fritz v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 1003
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 21, 1968
DocketNo. P68/82; protest 63/19929 (San Francisco); No. P68/83; protest 64/2645 (San Francisco)
StatusPublished
This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 1003 (Fritz v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fritz v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1003 (cusc 1968).
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of electric motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of James G. Wiley Co., a/c Ungar Electric Tools, Inc. v. United States (49 Cust. Ct. 199, Abstract 66961), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
James G. Wiley Co. v. United States
49 Cust. Ct. 199 (U.S. Customs Court, 1962)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
60 Cust. Ct. 1003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fritz-v-united-states-cusc-1968.