Fritz v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 1003
United States Customs Court·Decided February 21, 1968·No. No. P68/82; protest 63/19929 (San Francisco); No. P68/83; protest 64/2645 (San Francisco)·Published
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of electric motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of James G. Wiley Co., a/c Ungar Electric Tools, Inc. v. United States (49 Cust. Ct. 199, Abstract 66961), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fritz v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1003 (cusc 1968).
60 Cust. Ct. 1003 (Fritz v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
James G. Wiley Co. v. United States
49 Cust. Ct. 199 (U.S. Customs Court, 1962)