Fritz v. Lebanon Mut. Ins.
26 A. 7, 154 Pa. 384, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 899
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 20, 1893·No. Appeal, No. 5·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The first four specifications of error are not assigned according to our rules.
The remaining specifications all bear upon the question, whether there was a waiver by the company of the provision in its policy which required proofs of loss to be furnished within fifteen days after the notice of loss. This was the pivotal point in the case. Without going into the details of the evidence, we think there was sufficient upon this point to go to the jury, and that it was properly submitted.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fritz v. Lebanon Mut. Ins., 26 A. 7, 154 Pa. 384, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 899 (Pa. 1893).
26 A. 7 (Fritz v. Lebanon Mut. Ins.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Acklin v. McCalmont Oil Co.
50 A. 955 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)
Dennis v. Citizens Insurance
4 Pa. Super. 225 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)
Earley v. Mutual Fire Insurance
36 A. 195 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)