Fritz v. Lebanon Mut. Ins.

26 A. 7, 154 Pa. 384, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 899
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 20, 1893
DocketAppeal, No. 5
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 26 A. 7 (Fritz v. Lebanon Mut. Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fritz v. Lebanon Mut. Ins., 26 A. 7, 154 Pa. 384, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 899 (Pa. 1893).

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

The first four specifications of error are not assigned according to our rules.

The remaining specifications all bear upon the question, whether there was a waiver by the company of the provision in its policy which required proofs of loss to be furnished within fifteen days after the notice of loss. This was the pivotal point in the case. Without going into the details of the evidence, we think there was sufficient upon this point to go to the jury, and that it was properly submitted.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Acklin v. McCalmont Oil Co.
50 A. 955 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)
Dennis v. Citizens Insurance
4 Pa. Super. 225 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)
Earley v. Mutual Fire Insurance
36 A. 195 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 A. 7, 154 Pa. 384, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fritz-v-lebanon-mut-ins-pa-1893.