Fritz v. Krasne
This text of 248 A.D. 573 (Fritz v. Krasne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the action by this plaintiff against Sam Chertok and others (judgment in which is herewith affirmed, ante, p. 573) plaintiff sought to recover damages for personal injuries against defendant Chertok as the operator of the car by which plaintiff was injured, and against these defendants as having charge, care and management thereof. After entry of judgment in that action an order was entered severing the action as against defendant Chertok and granting a new trial as to these defendants. Thereafter the new trial was had at Trial Term without a jury, and the judgment herein appealed from was entered dismissing the complaint as to these defendants. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ. [161 Misc. 442.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.D. 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fritz-v-krasne-nyappdiv-1936.