Fritz v. Division of Employment Security

Missouri Court of Appeals

Fritz v. Division of Employment Security

386 S.W.3d 907, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1536

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 4, 2012·No. No. WD 75065·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Claimant Brad Fritz appeals from an order issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his petition for reassessment of overpaid unemployment benefits. After a thorough review of the record, we concluded that the Commission’s order is supported by sufficient competent evidence in the record, that the Commission acted within its powers, that the decision was not procured by fraud, and that the facts found by the Commission support the award. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Claimant Brad Fritz appeals from an order issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his petition for reassessment of overpaid unemployment benefits. After a thorough review of the record, we concluded that the Commission’s order is supported by sufficient competent evidence in the record, that the Commission acted within its powers, that the decision was not procured by fraud, and that the facts found by the Commission support the award. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Fritz v. Division of Employment Security, 386 S.W.3d 907, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1536 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

386 S.W.3d 907 (Fritz v. Division of Employment Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.