Fritz v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fritz v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

114 A.D.2d 318, 494 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52992

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 17, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 114 A.D.2d 318 (Fritz v. Consolidated Rail Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fritz v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 114 A.D.2d 318, 494 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52992 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Burton Sherman, J.), entered July 12, 1984, which awarded plaintiff $1,250,000 plus interest and costs, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered on the issue of damages, without costs, unless plaintiff John Fritz, within 20 days after service upon his attorney of a copy of the order to be entered, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to a reduction of the award for future lost earnings from $450,000 to $360,000, and the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff John Fritz so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.

The award for future lost earnings should be reduced to $360,000, the amount suggested by the evidence and requested by the plaintiff. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Lynch and Milonas, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Burton Sherman, J.), entered July 12, 1984, which awarded plaintiff $1,250,000 plus interest and costs, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered on the issue of damages, without costs, unless plaintiff John Fritz, within 20 days after service upon his attorney of a copy of the order to be entered, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to a reduction of the award for future lost earnings from $450,000 to $360,000, and the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff John Fritz so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.

The award for future lost earnings should be reduced to $360,000, the amount suggested by the evidence and requested by the plaintiff. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Lynch and Milonas, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 A.D.2d 318, 494 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fritz-v-consolidated-rail-corp-nyappdiv-1985.