Fritz v. City of Buffalo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fritz v. City of Buffalo

253 A.D. 788, 1 N.Y.S.2d 853, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5543

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 23, 1937·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby and Taylor, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal; Crosby, J., on the facts on the ground that the verdict of the jury is against the weight of the evidence as to the negligence of the defendant; Taylor, J., on the law and the facts on the ground that the verdict of the jury is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence as to defendant’s negligence. (The judgment awards plaintiff damages for personal injuries sustained on a skating rink.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Crosby, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby and Taylor, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal; Crosby, J., on the facts on the ground that the verdict of the jury is against the weight of the evidence as to the negligence of the defendant; Taylor, J., on the law and the facts on the ground that the verdict of the jury is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence as to defendant’s negligence. (The judgment awards plaintiff damages for personal injuries sustained on a skating rink.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Crosby, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Fritz v. City of Buffalo, 253 A.D. 788, 1 N.Y.S.2d 853, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5543 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

253 A.D. 788 (Fritz v. City of Buffalo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.