Fritz Ott Bill R. Frisbie v. Securities and Exchange Commission Catherine Gallagher John Burns the Federal Bureau of Investigation

Ninth Circuit

Fritz Ott Bill R. Frisbie v. Securities and Exchange Commission Catherine Gallagher John Burns the Federal Bureau of Investigation

60 F.3d 834, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25489, 1995 WL 392130

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJuly 3, 1995

Docket94-17072

StatusPublished

This text of 60 F.3d 834 (Fritz Ott Bill R. Frisbie v. Securities and Exchange Commission Catherine Gallagher John Burns the Federal Bureau of Investigation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fritz Ott Bill R. Frisbie v. Securities and Exchange Commission Catherine Gallagher John Burns the Federal Bureau of Investigation, 60 F.3d 834, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25489, 1995 WL 392130 (9th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

60 F.3d 834
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Fritz OTT; Bill R. Frisbie, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION; Catherine Gallagher;
John Burns; The Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-17072.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 26, 1995.*
Decided July 3, 1995.

Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Fritz Ott and Bill Frisbie appeal pro se the district court's dismissal with prejudice of their complaint against the Securities Exchange Commission, the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (the "FBI") and individual employees alleging various causes of action under the United States Constitution and numerous federal and state statutes, arising from government investigation and prosecution of litigation against National Real Estate Fund and Capital Planning Associates. The district court found that the last contested activity that any federal defendant allegedly engaged in occurred over eight years ago, and dismissed the amended complaint as barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. Ott and Frisbie provide no explanation for their failure to file their action within the statutes of limitations. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's dismissal of the amended complaint.

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

60 F.3d 834
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Fritz OTT; Bill R. Frisbie, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION; Catherine Gallagher;
John Burns; The Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-17072.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 26, 1995.*
Decided July 3, 1995.

Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Fritz Ott and Bill Frisbie appeal pro se the district court's dismissal with prejudice of their complaint against the Securities Exchange Commission, the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (the "FBI") and individual employees alleging various causes of action under the United States Constitution and numerous federal and state statutes, arising from government investigation and prosecution of litigation against National Real Estate Fund and Capital Planning Associates. The district court found that the last contested activity that any federal defendant allegedly engaged in occurred over eight years ago, and dismissed the amended complaint as barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. Ott and Frisbie provide no explanation for their failure to file their action within the statutes of limitations. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's dismissal of the amended complaint.

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F.3d 834, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25489, 1995 WL 392130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fritz-ott-bill-r-frisbie-v-securities-and-exchange-ca9-1995.