Fritz Keith Peters v. State
This text of Fritz Keith Peters v. State (Fritz Keith Peters v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-19-00126-CR
FRITZ KEITH PETERS, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 385th District Court Midland County, Texas Trial Court No. CR48226, Honorable Jeffrey Todd Robnett, Presiding
September 13, 2019
ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ.
Appellant Fritz Keith Peters appeals his conviction for forgery of a financial
instrument. Appellant’s brief was due on August 12, 2019, but was not filed. By letter of
August 19, 2019, we notified appellant’s counsel that the brief was overdue and
admonished him that failure to file a brief by August 29 would result in the appeal being
abated and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. TEX. R. APP. P.
38.8(b)(2), (3). To date, appellant’s counsel has not filed a brief or had any further
communication with this court. Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further
proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall determine the following:
1. whether appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;
2. whether appellant is indigent;
3. whether appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel due to counsel’s failure to timely file an appellate brief, see Ex parte Briggs, 187 S.W.3d 458, 467 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding “a reasonably competent attorney—regardless of whether he is retained or appointed—must seek to advance his client’s best defense in a reasonably competent manner”);
4. whether new counsel should be appointed; and
5. if appellant desires to continue the appeal, the final date on which appellant will file appellant’s brief.
The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this court by October 11, 2019.
If it is determined that appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent, and has
been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint him new
counsel; the name, address, email address, and phone number of any new counsel
appointed shall be included in the aforementioned findings. Should further time be
needed to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before October 11, 2019.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fritz Keith Peters v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fritz-keith-peters-v-state-texapp-2019.