Fritz Busche v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
This text of 229 F.2d 437 (Fritz Busche v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
229 F.2d 437
56-1 USTC P 9273
Fritz BUSCHE, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
No. 15631.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Feb. 7, 1956.
Harold E. Smith, Atlanta, Ga., Smith & Webb, Atlanta, Ga., of counsel, for petitioner.
Melva M. Graney, Atty. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., Louise Foster, Atty. Dept. of Justice, John Potts Barnes, Chief Counsel, Int. Rev. Service, John M. Morawski, Sp. Atty., Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Before BORAH, TUTTLE and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the opinion of the Tax Court, 23 T.C. 709.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
229 F.2d 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fritz-busche-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca5-1956.