FRITZ ALISME v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of FRITZ ALISME v. STATE OF FLORIDA (FRITZ ALISME v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
FRITZ ALISME, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D20-413
[April 30, 2020]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrew L. Siegel, Judge; L.T. Case No. 09-022392 CF10A.
Fritz Alisme, Florida City, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
GROSS, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
FRITZ ALISME v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fritz-alisme-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2020.