Fritts, Charles v. Ronnie Waldrop dba Peerless Painting

2021 TN WC 166
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedMarch 25, 2021
Docket2019-03-0997
StatusPublished

This text of 2021 TN WC 166 (Fritts, Charles v. Ronnie Waldrop dba Peerless Painting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fritts, Charles v. Ronnie Waldrop dba Peerless Painting, 2021 TN WC 166 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2021).

Opinion

FILED Mar 25, 2021 11:41 AM(ET)

TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

at 2 AS

jie tas. Ae } 2 veneer el WAN scooslll ee

i Noes.

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT KNOXVILLE CHARLES FRITTS, ) Docket No. 2019-03-0997 Employee, ) V. ) State File No. 58711-2019 RONNIE WALDROP dba ) PEERLESS PAINTING, ) Judge Pamela B. Johnson Uninsured Employer. ) COMPENSATION ORDER

Decision on the Record

Charles Fritts suffered injuries when he fell from scaffolding while working for Ronnie Waldrop doing business as Peerless Painting. Mr. Fritts seeks past and ongoing medical benefits and temporary and permanent disability benefits for this work injury. For the reasons below, the Court grants the requested benefits in part.

History of Claim

Mr. Fritts filed a Petition for Benefit Determination for a May 30, 2019 injury. He fell about thirty-five feet from scaffolding while cleaning windows.

Mr. Fritts was airlifted to the hospital due to the severity of his injuries. He was hospitalized for four days initially and underwent surgery to repair his fractured pelvis and right wrist. The day after his release, he returned to the hospital for surgery to repair his spleen and suffered a stroke and aortic blood clot while hospitalized. After his release, Mr. Fritts remained under the care of his treating physicians, Dr. William Oros (orthopedic surgeon) and Dr. Scott Stevens (vascular surgeon).

To prove the employment relationship, Mr. Fritts served Mr. Waldrop with Requests for Admissions. When Mr. Waldrop did not respond, the Court deemed them admitted.

The admissions proved the following: Charles Fritts fell at a construction project on May 30, 2019, where he was working in the course and scope of his employment with

1 Ronnie Waldrop. Mr. Fritts sustained severe and disabling injuries as a result of the May 30, 2019 incident, but Mr. Waldrop did not provide any medical or disability benefits.

At the time of the incident, Mr. Waldrop provided all the necessary equipment and tools for Mr. Fritts to perform his job duties. Mr. Waldrop controlled all aspects of the work performed by Mr. Fritts. Mr. Waldrop agreed to pay Mr. Fritts $20.00 per hour for a daily rate of $200.00.

Afterward, Mr. Fritts moved for partial summary judgment regarding the employment relationship. Mr. Waldrop did not file a written response but denied that Mr. Fritts was his employee during the motion hearing.

The Court granted partial summary judgment concluding that Mr. Fritts proved an employment relationship between the parties. Specifically, the Court held that: Mr. Fritts proved he was performing his duties in the course and scope of employment for Mr. Waldrop on May 30, 2019; Mr. Waldrop provided all the necessary equipment and tools and exercised control over Mr. Fritts’s work; and Mr. Fritts was to be paid $20.00 per hour for a daily rate of $200.00.

This case then proceeded to a Compensation Hearing. At this point, Mr. Waldrop stopped participating in the litigation.

Mr. Fritts submitted his medical records and itemized medical expenses documenting treatment provided by Med-Trans Air Medical Transport, OrthoTennessee (Dr. William Oros), University of Tennessee Medical Center, and UT Vascular and Transplant Surgeons (Dr. Scott Stevens).

He also introduced the C-32 Standard Medical Report of Dr. C.M. Salekin, whom he saw for an independent medical evaluation. Dr. Salekin concluded that the injury resulted in the need for treatment and that the employment activity, more likely than not, was primarily responsible for the injury and need for treatment. He further noted that Mr. Fritts was taken completely off work from the injury date to the “present.” Dr. Salekin placed Mr. Fritts at maximum medical improvement on September 19, 2020 (the date of the report), and he assigned a twelve-percent permanent impairment and permanent restrictions.

Mr. Waldrop did not object to Mr. Fritts’s evidence or present any countervailing evidence.

Mr. Fritts contended that he is entitled to temporary total disability benefits from May 30, 2019, through September 19, 2020, for a total of sixty-eight weeks and two days or $45,602.24. He also claimed that he is entitled to permanent partial disability (original award) based on the twelve-percent rating, for a total of fifty-four weeks or $36,000.18. He

2 argued his initial compensation period expires October 2, 2021, based on the date of maximum medical improvement and his permanent impairment. Finally, he claimed that he is entitled to payment of the medical expenses incurred due to his work injury as well as ongoing treatment with his physicians.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

At a Compensation Hearing where the injured employee has arrived at a trial on the merits, the employee must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he is entitled to the requested benefits. Willis v. All Staff; 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 42, at *18 (Nov. 9, 2015); see also Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2020).

To recover workers’ compensation benefits, Mr. Fritts must show his injuries were caused by a specific incident arising primarily out of his employment. His injuries arise primarily out of his employment only if he shows to a reasonable degree of medical certainty that his employment contributed more than fifty percent in causing them. “Shown to a reasonable degree of medical certainty” means that, in the opinion of the physician, it is more likely than not considering all causes. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14)(A)-(D).

Here, the evidence showed that Mr. Fritts was performing his duties in the course and scope of employment for Mr. Waldrop on May 30, 2019, when he fell and sustained serious injuries. The record further showed by expert opinion that the employment activity, more likely than not, was primarily responsible for the injuries and need for treatment. Due to his injuries, Mr. Fritts was taken completely off work from the injury date to the date of maximum medical improvement on September 19, 2020, and his injuries resulted in a twelve-percent permanent impairment and permanent restrictions. Thus, due to the uncontroverted opinions of Dr. Salekin, the Court holds Mr. Fritts’s injury arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of his employment and resulted in a twelve-percent permanent impairment to the whole person.

Accordingly, based on the preponderance of the evidence, the Court concludes Mr. Fritts is entitled to permanent disability benefits totaling $36,000.18, which is calculated by multiplying twelve percent by 450 weeks and his compensation rate. Mr. Fritts’s initial compensation period expires on October 2, 2021. See generally Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6- 207(3)(A).

Turning to his claim for temporary total disability benefits, these benefits are payable to an injured employee who is totally disabled from working by his injury and while he is recovering as far as the nature of the injury permits. Cleek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 19 S.W.3d 770, 776 (Tenn. 2000). To recover, Mr. Fritts must show he was (1) totally disabled from working by a compensable injury; (2) that there was a causal connection between the injury and his inability to work; and (3) the duration of that period of disability. Id. When an employee demonstrates the ability to return to work or attains maximum

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cleek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
19 S.W.3d 770 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 TN WC 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fritts-charles-v-ronnie-waldrop-dba-peerless-painting-tennworkcompcl-2021.