Fritsch v. Junius

Appellate Court of Illinois

Fritsch v. Junius

189 Ill. App. 36

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 8, 1914

DocketGen. No. 19,489

StatusPublished

This text of 189 Ill. App. 36 (Fritsch v. Junius) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fritsch v. Junius, 189 Ill. App. 36 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Municipal, Court of Chicago, § 26*—judge authorised to extend time for presenting statement of facts. Under paragraph 6 of section 23 of the Municipal Court Act, J. & A. ¶ 3335, any judge of that court may, within -the thirty days allowed for presenting a statement of facts or stenographic report, enter an order extending the time for presenting the same to the trial judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Municipal, Court of Chicago, § 26*—judge authorised to extend time for presenting statement of facts. Under paragraph 6 of section 23 of the Municipal Court Act, J. & A. ¶ 3335, any judge of that court may, within -the thirty days allowed for presenting a statement of facts or stenographic report, enter an order extending the time for presenting the same to the trial judge.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 Ill. App. 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fritsch-v-junius-illappct-1914.