Fritsch v. Junius

Appellate Court of Illinois

Fritsch v. Junius

189 Ill. App. 36

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided October 8, 1914·No. Gen. No. 19,489·Published

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Municipal, Court of Chicago, § 26*—judge authorised to extend time for presenting statement of facts. Under paragraph 6 of section 23 of the Municipal Court Act, J. & A. ¶ 3335, any judge of that court may, within -the thirty days allowed for presenting a statement of facts or stenographic report, enter an order extending the time for presenting the same to the trial judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Municipal, Court of Chicago, § 26*—judge authorised to extend time for presenting statement of facts. Under paragraph 6 of section 23 of the Municipal Court Act, J. & A. ¶ 3335, any judge of that court may, within -the thirty days allowed for presenting a statement of facts or stenographic report, enter an order extending the time for presenting the same to the trial judge.

Fritsch v. Junius, 189 Ill. App. 36 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

189 Ill. App. 36 (Fritsch v. Junius) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.