Fristrom v. Peekskill Community Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fristrom v. Peekskill Community Hospital

239 A.D.2d 315, 657 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4602

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 5, 1997·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), entered April 24,1996, as, upon re-argument, adhered to its prior determination denying that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to compel nonparty witnesses to answer questions at their depositions which sought their expert opinions.

Ordered that, on the Court’s own motion, the appellant’s notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see, CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly held that the plaintiffs could not compel nonparty witnesses to answer questions at their depositions which sought their expert opinions (see, Cuccia v Brooklyn Med. Group, 171 AD2d 836; Horowitz v Upjohn Co., 149 AD2d 467; Waters v East Nassau Med. Group, 92 AD2d 893; Wilson v McCarthy, 53 AD2d 860). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), entered April 24,1996, as, upon re-argument, adhered to its prior determination denying that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to compel nonparty witnesses to answer questions at their depositions which sought their expert opinions.

Ordered that, on the Court’s own motion, the appellant’s notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see, CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly held that the plaintiffs could not compel nonparty witnesses to answer questions at their depositions which sought their expert opinions (see, Cuccia v Brooklyn Med. Group, 171 AD2d 836; Horowitz v Upjohn Co., 149 AD2d 467; Waters v East Nassau Med. Group, 92 AD2d 893; Wilson v McCarthy, 53 AD2d 860). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Fristrom v. Peekskill Community Hospital, 239 A.D.2d 315, 657 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4602 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

239 A.D.2d 315 (Fristrom v. Peekskill Community Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related