Friss v. State

720 So. 2d 293, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14046, 1998 WL 769804
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 6, 1998
DocketNo. 98-1029
StatusPublished

This text of 720 So. 2d 293 (Friss v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Friss v. State, 720 So. 2d 293, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14046, 1998 WL 769804 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

GRIFFIN, Chief Judge.

Appellant seeks review of a denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. The only argument raised by appellant that is arguably cognizable by habeas corpus is his contention that the offense of which he was convicted cannot be punished by incarceration. The lower court pointed out in its order, however, that a violation of section 741.31(4), Florida Statutes, is a first-degree misdemeanor, punishable by up to one year in jail. The petition for writ of habeas corpus was properly denied.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
720 So. 2d 293, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14046, 1998 WL 769804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friss-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.