Frison v. State

100 So. 3d 1252, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19846, 2012 WL 5621241
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 16, 2012·No. No. 5D12-1502·Published

Opinion

EVANDER, J.

Andre Frison [“Frison”] appeals the sentence that was imposed upon resen-tencing, arguing that he was not provided the proper credit for time served. We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing.

Frison was sentenced in 1989 to life in prison for sexual battery with a deadly weapon pursuant to section 794.011(3), Florida Statutes (1987).1 In 2011, he filed a rule 3.800 motion to correct illegal sentence, contending that pursuant to Graham v. Florida, — U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), his life sentence was illegal.2 The State agreed that because Frison was a juvenile at the time he committed the charged offense, Gra[1253] ham applied, making his life sentence without the possibility of parole an illegal sentence. After granting Frison’s motion, the trial court sentenced him to forty years in prison followed by one year community control and life probation. We reversed and remanded for a new resentenc-ing hearing because the trial court had failed to appoint counsel for Frison for the resentencing portion of the hearing. Frison v. State, 76 So.3d 1103 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011).

At the onset of the most recent resen-tencing hearing, Frison’s counsel asserted that after consideration of gain time, Fri-son had already served forty years in prison. Although the State did not dispute such allegation, no stipulation or evidence was presented to the trial court to establish the amount of credit Frison was entitled to receive for time already served in prison. At the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court imposed a sentence of thirty-five years in prison followed by six months community control and four and one-half years probation.3 Frison was awarded thirty-five years credit for time served.

If Frison was entitled to receive forty years credit, then he has completed his sentence. However, from the record provided, we cannot determine whether Frison’s claim is accurate or not. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing to determine the proper amount of credit that Frison is entitled to receive for time served.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

PALMER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frison v. State, 100 So. 3d 1252, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19846, 2012 WL 5621241 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

100 So. 3d 1252 (Frison v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frison v. State
76 So. 3d 1103 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Graham v. Florida
176 L. Ed. 2d 825 (Supreme Court, 2010)