Frishkorn v. Ogden

77 So. 970, 16 Ala. App. 358, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 39
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 15, 1918·No. 1 Div. 255.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BROWN, P. J.

[1] It is well settled that a lease, like any other conveyance of a present estate in land, transfers to the lessee the right to the unmatured vegetable products growing upon the land at the time, unless they are expressly excepted from its operation. 2 Tiffany, Landlord & Tenant, § 249; Edwards v. Perkins, 7 Or. 149; Willey v. Conner, 44 Vt. 68; Emery v. Fugina, 68 Wis. 505, 32 N. W. 236. Under the rule the crops passed to the lessee, Ogden.

[2] The only objection to the question made the basis of the third assignment of error was met by the defendant, with permission of the court, filing the plea of set-off, and the objection was properly overruled.

[3] If by filing the plea of set-off during the trial the plaintiff was placed at a disadvantage by not being prepared to meet this defense, the fact should have been made known to the court at that time. He could not remain silent and take his chance, and afterwards, on motion for new trial, plead that he was surprised.

There is no error in the record.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frishkorn v. Ogden, 77 So. 970, 16 Ala. App. 358, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 39 (Ala. Ct. App. 1918).

77 So. 970 (Frishkorn v. Ogden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City Council of Greenville v. White
11 So. 2d 816 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1943)
Lamar v. Johnson
81 So. 140 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1919)