Frisch v. Dussault
This text of 166 A.D. 357 (Frisch v. Dussault) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
But one question is raised upon this appeal. The plaintiff recovered judgment in the City Court of Schenectady for twenty-five dollars. Defendant appealed to the County Court for a new trial upon which the plaintiff recovered judgment for twenty-one dollars and fifty cents. Neither party made any offer of judgment as provided by section 3070 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The County Court awarded costs to the plaintiff. The defendant claims that the plaintiff, not having recovered fifty dollars damages in the County Court, under section 3228 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is not entitled to costs.
Section 3070 of the Code of Civil Procedure reads: “If neither party makes an offer, as provided herein, the party in whose favor the verdict, report or decision in the appellate court is given, shall be entitled to recover his costs upon the appeal.” The County Court properly held that the plaintiff was entitled to costs. (Lawson v. Speer, 91 App. Div. 411; Pierano v. Merritt, 148 N. Y. 289.)
The judgment should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 A.D. 357, 152 N.Y.S. 15, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frisch-v-dussault-nyappdiv-1915.