Frisbie v. Gardiner
This text of 917 So. 2d 403 (Frisbie v. Gardiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
David FRISBIE, Appellant,
v.
Michael GARDINER and Edmond Gardiner, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Donna Waters Romero of Grotefeld & Denenberg, LLC, Plantation, for appellant.
Jennifer L. Gardner, West Palm Beach, for appellees.
*404 SHAHOOD, J.
Appellant, David Frisbie, appeals the Final Judgment which dismissed his cause of action against appellees, Michael Gardiner and Edmond Gardiner, for lack of prosecution.
We reverse the dismissal of appellant's complaint for lack of prosecution because there was, on the face of the record, activity within the one-year period. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.420; Wilson v. Salamon, 30 Fla. L. Weekly S701, ___ So.2d ___, 2005 WL 2663432 (Fla. Oct. 20, 2005). The activity in this case was a motion to withdraw as counsel and an order granting the motion.
Reversed and remanded; appellant's cause of action reinstated.
STONE and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
917 So. 2d 403, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frisbie-v-gardiner-fladistctapp-2006.