Frisbie v. Fowler

2 Conn. 707
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 15, 1818·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Swift, €1». J.

It is true, that i» England, to charge a woman with a breach of chastity- — as to charge her with guilty of adultery, or fornication, or to call her a whore — -is not actionable, except by custom in London, withv out stating and proving special damage ; because these are not offences punishable by the common law, but only in the ecclesiastical courts, where the party injured by such charges must seek redress. But as by the laws of this state, the breach of chastity, in every form — from adultery to mere lascivious carriage — is punishable by statute,

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frisbie v. Fowler, 2 Conn. 707 (Colo. 1818).

2 Conn. 707 (Frisbie v. Fowler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKone v. Addiss, No. Cv94 053 59 64 (May 12, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 5287 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Weinberg v. Pollock, No. Cv89-027773 (Jun. 19, 1991)
1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 5462 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1991)
Kennenberg v. Neff
49 A. 853 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1901)
Ledlie v. Wallen
42 P. 289 (Montana Supreme Court, 1895)
Page v. Merwin
8 A. 675 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1886)
McQueen v. Fulgham
27 Tex. 463 (Texas Supreme Court, 1864)
Smith v. Silence
4 Iowa 321 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1856)