Frisbee v. Poole
This text of 21 N.W. 470 (Frisbee v. Poole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The terms of the mortgage are as follows: “This-mortgage is given as collateral security to the payment of certain, book-accounts, according to the terms of a certain contract bearing even date herewith, executed by the parties of the second part.” There is-nothing on the face of the mortgage itself showing that it was to secure future advances. The court, upon a substantial conflict of evidence on that point, finds as a fact that the contract referred to in the mortgage (which had been lost) did not provide for future advances-to the mortgagor. This is conclusive that the mortgage does not se[412]*412•cure future advances. It is therefore unnecessary to consider any other questions.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 N.W. 470, 32 Minn. 411, 1884 Minn. LEXIS 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frisbee-v-poole-minn-1884.