Frisbee v. Jacobs

New York Marine Court

Frisbee v. Jacobs

1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 235

DecidedMarch 15, 1880

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 235 (Frisbee v. Jacobs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Marine Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frisbee v. Jacobs, 1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 235 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

MoAdam, J.

The action is on a bank check drawn by the defendant. The complaint alleges presentation to the drawee, but fails to allege either want of funds of the drawer or notice of dishonor, and for this omission the defendant demurs. The demurrer is well taken (see Harker v. Anderson, 21 Wend. 372; Edwards on Bills, p. 396; Garvey v. Fowler, 4 Sanf. 665 ; 3 Abb. Pr. 252 ; 3 Hun, 190). Section 534 of the Code of Civil Procedure, allowing a plaintiff to set forth a copy of the instrument sued on, and to state that there is due thereon a sum which he claims, applies only to the parties primarily liable and not to those whose contract is conditional, and where it depends on facts outside the written instrument to charge them (Conklin v. Gandall, 1 Keyes, 228). In the case just cited it was held that the facts necessary to charge an indorser must be alleged. The demurrer is, therefore, well taken and must be sustained, with leave to the plaintiff to amend on payment within five days of $10 costs.

Note.—No appeal was taken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MoAdam, J.

The action is on a bank check drawn by the defendant. The complaint alleges presentation to the drawee, but fails to allege either want of funds of the drawer or notice of dishonor, and for this omission the defendant demurs. The demurrer is well taken (see Harker v. Anderson, 21 Wend. 372; Edwards on Bills, p. 396; Garvey v. Fowler, 4 Sanf. 665 ; 3 Abb. Pr. 252 ; 3 Hun, 190). Section 534 of the Code of Civil Procedure, allowing a plaintiff to set forth a copy of the instrument sued on, and to state that there is due thereon a sum which he claims, applies only to the parties primarily liable and not to those whose contract is conditional, and where it depends on facts outside the written instrument to charge them (Conklin v. Gandall, 1 Keyes, 228). In the case just cited it was held that the facts necessary to charge an indorser must be alleged. The demurrer is, therefore, well taken and must be sustained, with leave to the plaintiff to amend on payment within five days of $10 costs.

Note.—No appeal was taken.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frisbee-v-jacobs-nymarct-1880.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack