Frioux v. Johnson

100 Cal. App. 797
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedJuly 16, 1929
DocketCiv. No. 3795
StatusPublished

This text of 100 Cal. App. 797 (Frioux v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frioux v. Johnson, 100 Cal. App. 797 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

THE COURT.

Upon the authority of the case of In re Lovall, on Habeas Corpus, 207 Cal. 544 [279 Pac. 452], recently decided by the Supreme Court, distinguishing the questions involved in the above-entitled case from that of Robertson v. Langford, 95 Cal. App. 414 [273 Pac. 150], it is hereby ordered that the writ prayed for be and the same is hereby granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robertson v. Langford
273 P. 150 (California Court of Appeal, 1928)
In Re Lovall
279 P. 452 (California Supreme Court, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 Cal. App. 797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frioux-v-johnson-calctapp-1929.