Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Frija v. Yavne Construction Inc.

Frija v. Yavne Construction Inc.

280 A.D.2d 581, 720 N.Y.S.2d 808, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1662
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 20, 2001·Published

Opinion

—In an action, inter [582]*582alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated March 14, 2000, which granted the defendants’ motion, inter alia, to dismiss the second and third causes of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion, inter alia, to dismiss the second and third causes of action in the complaint (see, Matter of Morris v New York State Dept. of Taxation & Fin., 82 NY2d 135; Weiss v Marjam of Long Is., 270 AD2d 455; Kopec v Hempstead Gardens, 264 AD2d 714; Rubinberg v Correia Designs, 262 AD2d 474; Weisberger v Goldstein, 242 AD2d 622). Ritter, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frija v. Yavne Construction Inc., 280 A.D.2d 581, 720 N.Y.S.2d 808, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1662 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

280 A.D.2d 581 (Frija v. Yavne Construction Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morris v. New York State Department of Taxation & Finance
623 N.E.2d 1157 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
Weisberger v. Goldstein
242 A.D.2d 622 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Rubinberg v. Correia Designs, Ltd.
262 A.D.2d 474 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Kopec v. Hempstead Gardens, Inc.
264 A.D.2d 714 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Weiss v. Marjam of Long Island, Inc.
270 A.D.2d 455 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)