Frigidaire Sales Corp. v. Syracuse Investment Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Frigidaire Sales Corp. v. Syracuse Investment Corp.

239 A.D. 880

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1933·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment of County Court reversed on the law and judgment of Municipal Court affirmed, with costs in this court and in County Court on the ground that the annexing of the Frigidaire system to the realty was such that it lost its character as personal property and became a part of the real [881] estate. (Dryja v. Twarozynski, 238 App. Div. 760, decided January 17, 1933.) (See Pers. Prop. Law, § 67.) All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of County Court reversed on the law and judgment of Municipal Court affirmed, with costs in this court and in County Court on the ground that the annexing of the Frigidaire system to the realty was such that it lost its character as personal property and became a part of the real [881] estate. (Dryja v. Twarozynski, 238 App. Div. 760, decided January 17, 1933.) (See Pers. Prop. Law, § 67.) All concur.

Frigidaire Sales Corp. v. Syracuse Investment Corp., 239 A.D. 880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

239 A.D. 880 (Frigidaire Sales Corp. v. Syracuse Investment Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related