Frigidaire Sales Corp. v. Syracuse Investment Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Frigidaire Sales Corp. v. Syracuse Investment Corp.

239 A.D. 880

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1933

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 239 A.D. 880 (Frigidaire Sales Corp. v. Syracuse Investment Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frigidaire Sales Corp. v. Syracuse Investment Corp., 239 A.D. 880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of County Court reversed on the law and judgment of Municipal Court affirmed, with costs in this court and in County Court on the ground that the annexing of the Frigidaire system to the realty was such that it lost its character as personal property and became a part of the real [881]*881estate. (Dryja v. Twarozynski, 238 App. Div. 760, decided January 17, 1933.) (See Pers. Prop. Law, § 67.) All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of County Court reversed on the law and judgment of Municipal Court affirmed, with costs in this court and in County Court on the ground that the annexing of the Frigidaire system to the realty was such that it lost its character as personal property and became a part of the real [881]*881estate. (Dryja v. Twarozynski, 238 App. Div. 760, decided January 17, 1933.) (See Pers. Prop. Law, § 67.) All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

239 A.D. 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frigidaire-sales-corp-v-syracuse-investment-corp-nyappdiv-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack