Frigiano v. Ziccarelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Frigiano v. Ziccarelli

238 A.D.2d 307, 656 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3451

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 7, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 238 A.D.2d 307 (Frigiano v. Ziccarelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frigiano v. Ziccarelli, 238 A.D.2d 307, 656 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3451 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendant Joseph Maurice Ziccarelli appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), dated September 22, 1995, as, upon renewal, denied his motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s motion for summary judgment. Under the circumstances of this case, the continuous treatment doctrine of CPLR 214-a is applicable (see, Pace v Caron, 232 AD2d 617). Moreover, there are questions of fact as to whether the appellant was guilty of medical malpractice in his treatment of the plaintiff Lucille Frigiano. Ritter, J. P., Altman, Krausman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendant Joseph Maurice Ziccarelli appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), dated September 22, 1995, as, upon renewal, denied his motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s motion for summary judgment. Under the circumstances of this case, the continuous treatment doctrine of CPLR 214-a is applicable (see, Pace v Caron, 232 AD2d 617). Moreover, there are questions of fact as to whether the appellant was guilty of medical malpractice in his treatment of the plaintiff Lucille Frigiano. Ritter, J. P., Altman, Krausman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 A.D.2d 307, 656 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frigiano-v-ziccarelli-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack