Frigerio v. Morina
This text of 234 A.D. 888 (Frigerio v. Morina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order vacating notice of examination before trial reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, [889]*889with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that appealing defendant was entitled to examine plaintiff as to the defense of usury. Examination to proceed on five days’ notice before the person named and at the place and hour stated in the subpoena. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompldns, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 A.D. 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frigerio-v-morina-nyappdiv-1931.