Frieze v. People
This text of 12 Ill. App. 349 (Frieze v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The principal errors assigned upon this record seek to question various supposed rulings of the trial court overruling a motion for a continuance of the case, ad-' uniting and refusing to admit testimony, and giving and refusing instructions. These matters should have been preserved in a bill of exceptions and filed in the county court and made a part of its record. There is what purports to be a bill of exceptions attached to the record, but it is not by the clerk as a part of the record.
We are thus precluded from a consideration of most of the matters urged by plaintiff in error.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 Ill. App. 349, 1883 Ill. App. LEXIS 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frieze-v-people-illappct-1883.