Friesen's, Inc. v. Larson

443 N.W.2d 830, 1989 Minn. LEXIS 193, 1989 WL 88854
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided August 11, 1989·No. C7-88-1891·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

POPOVICH, Chief Justice.

We granted the petition of Donovan, McCarthy, Crassweller, Larson & Magie, P.A. to review the decision of the court of appeals reversing the summary judgment in petitioner’s favor in the St. Louis County District Court in this legal malpractice action. Friesens, Inc. v. Arnold Larson, 438 *831 N.W.2d 444 (Minn.App.1989). We reverse and reinstate the summary judgment.

The facts and procedural history are detailed in the decision of the court of appeals. It is our view that the trial court properly entered summary judgment against the plaintiff on its claim that the defendant law firm was negligent in failing to provide adequate representation. The record persuades us that there exist no genuine issues of material fact that the alleged negligence in the performance of legal representation prior to January 1, 1983, the time when the firm’s supervision and control over the file ceased, was causally related to any damages plaintiff might have incurred. Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & Keefe, 291 N.W.2d 686, 692 (Minn.1980).

Reversed and summary judgment reinstated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Friesen's, Inc. v. Larson, 443 N.W.2d 830, 1989 Minn. LEXIS 193, 1989 WL 88854 (Mich. 1989).

443 N.W.2d 830 (Friesen's, Inc. v. Larson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pine Island Farmers Coop v. Erstad & Riemer, P.A.
649 N.W.2d 444 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2002)
Suelthaus & Kaplan, P.C. v. Byron Oil Industries, Inc.
847 S.W.2d 873 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1992)