Friesen's, Inc. v. Larson
This text of 443 N.W.2d 830 (Friesen's, Inc. v. Larson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We granted the petition of Donovan, McCarthy, Crassweller, Larson & Magie, P.A. to review the decision of the court of appeals reversing the summary judgment in petitioner’s favor in the St. Louis County District Court in this legal malpractice action. Friesens, Inc. v. Arnold Larson, 438 *831 N.W.2d 444 (Minn.App.1989). We reverse and reinstate the summary judgment.
The facts and procedural history are detailed in the decision of the court of appeals. It is our view that the trial court properly entered summary judgment against the plaintiff on its claim that the defendant law firm was negligent in failing to provide adequate representation. The record persuades us that there exist no genuine issues of material fact that the alleged negligence in the performance of legal representation prior to January 1, 1983, the time when the firm’s supervision and control over the file ceased, was causally related to any damages plaintiff might have incurred. Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & Keefe, 291 N.W.2d 686, 692 (Minn.1980).
Reversed and summary judgment reinstated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
443 N.W.2d 830, 1989 Minn. LEXIS 193, 1989 WL 88854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friesens-inc-v-larson-minn-1989.