Fries v. United States

Federal Circuit

Fries v. United States

668 F. App'x 364

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided August 12, 2016·No. 2016-1242; 2016-1304·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Richard G. Fries appeals the dismissal of these actions by the Court of Federal Claims, as not within that court’s jurisdiction, or for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted.

Appeal No. 2016-1242 relates to Mr. Fries’ contention that an unnamed third party was the victim of a dental scam, and requests damages in the amount of 2.5 million dollars. Such a cause of action, sounding in tort, is not within the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims.

Appeal No. 2016-1304 concerns various allegations regarding drug testing, searches and seizures, and Mr. Fries’ credit rating. Again, the Court of Federal Claims correctly held that Mr. Fries has not stated a cause within the jurisdiction of that court.

The dismissals are AFFIRMED.

No costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Richard G. Fries appeals the dismissal of these actions by the Court of Federal Claims, as not within that court’s jurisdiction, or for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted.

Appeal No. 2016-1242 relates to Mr. Fries’ contention that an unnamed third party was the victim of a dental scam, and requests damages in the amount of 2.5 million dollars. Such a cause of action, sounding in tort, is not within the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims.

Appeal No. 2016-1304 concerns various allegations regarding drug testing, searches and seizures, and Mr. Fries’ credit rating. Again, the Court of Federal Claims correctly held that Mr. Fries has not stated a cause within the jurisdiction of that court.

The dismissals are AFFIRMED.

No costs.

Fries v. United States, 668 F. App'x 364 (Fed. Cir. 2016).

Pincite

668 F. App'x 364 (Fries v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.