Fries v. Rowan County Board of Education

172 S.E.2d 75, 7 N.C. App. 341, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1683
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 25, 1970
DocketNo. 7019SC29
StatusPublished

This text of 172 S.E.2d 75 (Fries v. Rowan County Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fries v. Rowan County Board of Education, 172 S.E.2d 75, 7 N.C. App. 341, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1683 (N.C. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

Campbell, J.

In the instant case, a citizen’s group seeks to challenge the action of the Rowan County School Board assigning pupils to the various schools of the North Rowan School District of Rowan County. General Statutes 115-176 to 115-179 establish a method of assignment of pupil school students and a method of challenge of that assignment. A “person aggrieved” by an order of a school board is given the right to appeal from an order of the board, within 10 days of the date of the order, to the Superior Court for a hearing de novo. G.S. 115-179.

There does not appear in the record any reason why this procedure was not followed in this case. When such an “integrated and adequate” procedure is established by the Legislature, it is meant to be followed. See King v. Baldwin, 276 N.C. 316, 172 S.E. 2d 12 (1970).

[345]*345Prior to the institution of this action, no appeal having been taken from the final order of the School Board as provided by G.S,. 115-179, the School Board proceeded with the changes necessary to implement its final order. This plan has now been in effect since the opening of school 27 August 1969, and most of the present school year has passed. To permit this type of action contrary to the procedure established by the Legislature would result in complete chaos and confusion for the school system. Compare with In Re Varner, 266 N.C. 409, 146 S.E. 2d 401 (1965).

The present action shows on its face that the plaintiffs have not complied with the procedure established by the Legislature for an action by “any person aggrieved by the final order of the [board].”

The action was properly dismissed.

Affirmed.

PARKER and Hedrick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. Baldwin
172 S.E.2d 12 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1970)
In Re the Assignment of Varner
146 S.E.2d 401 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 S.E.2d 75, 7 N.C. App. 341, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fries-v-rowan-county-board-of-education-ncctapp-1970.