Fries v. Fries

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fries v. Fries

138 A.D.2d 979

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 4, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 138 A.D.2d 979 (Fries v. Fries) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fries v. Fries, 138 A.D.2d 979 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by appellant [980]*980for poor person relief and for an extension of time to perfect appeal denied. Memorandum: Appellant has failed to show that he has served the notice of motion upon the County Attorney and has failed to set forth facts so that the merit to his appeal can be ascertained (see, CPLR 1101 [a], [c]; Matter of Teeter v Reed, 57 AD2d 735). Present — Doerr, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by appellant [980]*980for poor person relief and for an extension of time to perfect appeal denied. Memorandum: Appellant has failed to show that he has served the notice of motion upon the County Attorney and has failed to set forth facts so that the merit to his appeal can be ascertained (see, CPLR 1101 [a], [c]; Matter of Teeter v Reed, 57 AD2d 735). Present — Doerr, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 A.D.2d 979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fries-v-fries-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack