Frierson v. Mutual Realty Co.
This text of 174 S.E. 144 (Frierson v. Mutual Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the allegations of the petition, construed most strongly against the plaintiff, she was not exercising ordinary care when she approached the defendant’s apartment house and opened a door therein and simultaneously stepped into a dark and unUghted basement (an unlighted stairway leading from the door down to the floor of the basement), and was precipitated to the basement floor. The averment in the petition that she was exercising ordinary care was not supported by the facts set forth therein. The court properly dismissed the case on general demurrer. See Hendriks v. Jones, 28 Ga. App. 335 (111 S. E. 81), and cit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 S.E. 144, 48 Ga. App. 839, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frierson-v-mutual-realty-co-gactapp-1934.