Frierson v. Brady

518 F. App'x 206
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 17, 2013·No. No. 12-7709·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marcus Antonio Frierson appeals the district court’s judgment entered for the Defendants following a jury trial on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, Frierson’s motion for production of transcripts is denied, and we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frierson v. Brady, 518 F. App'x 206 (4th Cir. 2013).

518 F. App'x 206 (Frierson v. Brady) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related