Frierson v. Bell
511 F. App'x 240
Opinion
Marcus Antonio Frierson appeals the district court’s judgment entered for the Defendants following a jury trial on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Frierson v. Bell, 511 F. App'x 240 (4th Cir. 2013).
511 F. App'x 240 (Frierson v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Civil action for deprivation of rights
42 U.S.C. § 1983