Frierson v. Bell

Fourth Circuit

Frierson v. Bell

511 F. App'x 240

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 25, 2013

DocketNo. 12-7745

StatusPublished

This text of 511 F. App'x 240 (Frierson v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frierson v. Bell, 511 F. App'x 240 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Marcus Antonio Frierson appeals the district court’s judgment entered for the Defendants following a jury trial on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Marcus Antonio Frierson appeals the district court’s judgment entered for the Defendants following a jury trial on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

511 F. App'x 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frierson-v-bell-ca4-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack