Frierson Co. v. Union Nat. Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Frierson Co. v. Union Nat. Bank

285 S.W. 941, 1926 Tex. App. LEXIS 997

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 1, 1926·No. No. 1103.·Published

Opinion

HIGHTOWEB, C. J.

The only question for decision in this case is as to whether money on deposit in a bank that was paid to the surviving wife of a deceased employee as compensation under the Workman’s Compensation Act of this state (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. 1925, art. 8306 et seq.), is subject to garnishment by a creditor of the deceased. The trial court held that it was not, and. we affirm that holding. See Gaddy v. First National Bank, Garnishee (Tex. Civ. App.) 283 S. W. 277.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HIGHTOWEB, C. J.

The only question for decision in this case is as to whether money on deposit in a bank that was paid to the surviving wife of a deceased employee as compensation under the Workman’s Compensation Act of this state (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. 1925, art. 8306 et seq.), is subject to garnishment by a creditor of the deceased. The trial court held that it was not, and. we affirm that holding. See Gaddy v. First National Bank, Garnishee (Tex. Civ. App.) 283 S. W. 277.

Frierson Co. v. Union Nat. Bank, 285 S.W. 941, 1926 Tex. App. LEXIS 997 (Tex. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

285 S.W. 941 (Frierson Co. v. Union Nat. Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related