Friends of the River v. National Marine Fisheries Service
This text of Friends of the River v. National Marine Fisheries Service (Friends of the River v. National Marine Fisheries Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRIENDS OF THE RIVER, No. 2:16-cv-00818-DJC-JDP 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Parties have filed a joint case management statement. (ECF No. 155.) Having 18 review the positions of the parties, the Court will adopt a modified version of the 19 schedule proposed by Federal Defendants. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 20 that: 21 1. No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted 22 without leave of the Court, good cause having been shown. See Fed. R. Civ. 23 P.16(b); Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 27 604 (9th Cir. 24 1992). 25 2. On or before February 21, 2025, Federal Defendants shall lodge with the 26 court supplements to the administrative record for the decisions challenged 27 by Plaintiff. Federal Defendants shall simultaneously serve a copy of the 28 supplement to the administrative record on counsel for all parties. 1 3. No later than March 14, 2025, the parties shall meet and confer to resolve 2 any disputes as to the completeness of the administrative record, the 3 applicability of any exceptions to record review, or any asserted need for 4 judicial review of extra-record materials. 5 4. On or before March 28, 2025, Plaintiff shall file any motion related to 6 complete or supplement the administrative record that cannot be resolved 7 by meet and confer efforts. 8 5. Motions for Summary Judgment shall be filed on the following schedule: 9 a. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment shall be filed on or before April 10 7, 2025; 11 b. Defendants’ Opposition and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment shall 12 be filed on or before May 12, 2025; 13 c. Defendant-Intervenor’s Opposition and Cross-Motion for Summary 14 Judgment shall be filed on or before May 19, 2025;1 15 d. Plaintiff’s Opposition and Reply Shall be filed on or before June 16, 16 2025; 17 e. Defendants’ Reply shall be filed on or before July 7, 2025; and 18 f. Defendant-Intervenor’s Reply shall be filed on or before July 14, 2025. 19 The Court does not, at this time, extend the page limit for cross-summary 20 judgment motions. However, should the parties jointly or separately believe that a 21 more extensive page limit is necessary, the parties may request that the Court extend 22 the page limits described in the Court’s Civil Standing Order. 23
24 Dated: February 6, 2025 /s/ Daniel J. Calabretta THE HONORABLE DANIEL J. CALABRETTA 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Friends of the River v. National Marine Fisheries Service, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friends-of-the-river-v-national-marine-fisheries-service-caed-2025.