Friends of the Everglades, Inc. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Friends of the Everglades, Inc. v. State

491 So. 2d 1257, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1645, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9087

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 29, 1986

DocketNo. 85-2507

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 491 So. 2d 1257 (Friends of the Everglades, Inc. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Friends of the Everglades, Inc. v. State, 491 So. 2d 1257, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1645, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9087 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has totally failed to show that it is prejudiced by not having an entry into the permit proceeding at some point before an agreement is made between a land developer and the Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission to conditionally issue a permit (to relocate endangered species), rather than at a subsequent public hearing where any interested person may challenge the Commission action before the permit becomes effective. See Friends of the Everglades, Inc. v. South Florida Regional Planning Council, 456 So.2d 491 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) (where planning council’s staff activities did not determine substantial interests, involve entry of a rule or order, or preclude a meaningful entry into the agency’s decision-making process, a petition to intervene was premature). The final order which dismisses appellant’s petition and notice of intervention is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has totally failed to show that it is prejudiced by not having an entry into the permit proceeding at some point before an agreement is made between a land developer and the Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission to conditionally issue a permit (to relocate endangered species), rather than at a subsequent public hearing where any interested person may challenge the Commission action before the permit becomes effective. See Friends of the Everglades, Inc. v. South Florida Regional Planning Council, 456 So.2d 491 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) (where planning council’s staff activities did not determine substantial interests, involve entry of a rule or order, or preclude a meaningful entry into the agency’s decision-making process, a petition to intervene was premature). The final order which dismisses appellant’s petition and notice of intervention is therefore

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

491 So. 2d 1257, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1645, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friends-of-the-everglades-inc-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack