Friends of the Everglades, Inc. v. State

491 So. 2d 1257, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1645, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9087
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 29, 1986·No. No. 85-2507·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has totally failed to show that it is prejudiced by not having an entry into the permit proceeding at some point before an agreement is made between a land developer and the Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission to conditionally issue a permit (to relocate endangered species), rather than at a subsequent public hearing where any interested person may challenge the Commission action before the permit becomes effective. See Friends of the Everglades, Inc. v. South Florida Regional Planning Council, 456 So.2d 491 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) (where planning council’s staff activities did not determine substantial interests, involve entry of a rule or order, or preclude a meaningful entry into the agency’s decision-making process, a petition to intervene was premature). The final order which dismisses appellant’s petition and notice of intervention is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Friends of the Everglades, Inc. v. State, 491 So. 2d 1257, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1645, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9087 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

491 So. 2d 1257 (Friends of the Everglades, Inc. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Friends of the Everglades, Inc. v. State, Department of Community Affairs
495 So. 2d 1193 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)