Friends of Portsmouth Township v. Charter Township of Portsmouth
751 N.W.2d 43, 481 Mich. 943
This text of 751 N.W.2d 43 (Friends of Portsmouth Township v. Charter Township of Portsmouth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Friends of Portsmouth Township v. Charter Township of Portsmouth, 751 N.W.2d 43, 481 Mich. 943 (Mich. 2008).
Opinion
FRIENDS OF PORTSMOUTH TOWNSHIP and Dr. Mark Stewart, Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF PORTSMOUTH and Portsmouth Township Planning Commission, Respondents-Appellees, and
Chris Ratajczak and Karla Ratajczak, Intervening Respondents-Appellees, and
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Intervening Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 21, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Oak Park Public Safety Officers Ass'n v. City of Oak Park
751 N.W.2d 43 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2008)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
751 N.W.2d 43, 481 Mich. 943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friends-of-portsmouth-township-v-charter-township-of-portsmouth-mich-2008.