Friends of Portsmouth Township v. Charter Township of Portsmouth
751 N.W.2d 43, 481 Mich. 943
Opinion
FRIENDS OF PORTSMOUTH TOWNSHIP and Dr. Mark Stewart, Petitioners-Appellants,
v.
CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF PORTSMOUTH and Portsmouth Township Planning Commission, Respondents-Appellees, and
Chris Ratajczak and Karla Ratajczak, Intervening Respondents-Appellees, and
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Intervening Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 21, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Friends of Portsmouth Township v. Charter Township of Portsmouth, 751 N.W.2d 43, 481 Mich. 943 (Mich. 2008).
751 N.W.2d 43 (Friends of Portsmouth Township v. Charter Township of Portsmouth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Oak Park Public Safety Officers Ass'n v. City of Oak Park
751 N.W.2d 43 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2008)